Skip to content
Legal Research And Analysis

Legal Research And Analysis

Stay Connected ! Stay Informed !

  • Home
    • ABOUT US
      • ADVISORY BOARD
        • EDITORIAL BOARD
          • Governing Body
            • Terms Of Use
  • Legal Research and Analysis Journal
  • LRASJ
  • Free Courses
  • LRA Law Firm
  • LRAWOMEN
    • LRAWOMEN Volunteers Program
  • Notice Board LRA
  • Search
  • Toggle search form
  • Kenyan General Elections,2022
    Kenyan General Elections,2022 LRA Explains
  • WHO IS A ‘MINORITY’ IN INDIA? HINDUS AS MINORITY
    WHO IS A ‘MINORITY’
    IN INDIA? HINDUS AS
    MINORITY
    current affairs
  • CURRENT AFFAIRS; Ten Second readout
    CURRENT AFFAIRS; Ten Second readouts current affairs
  • Africa Has the World's Highest Potential for Solar Energy
    Africa Has the World’s Highest Potential for Solar Energy current affairs
  • As US exits Afghanistan, China eyes $1 trillion in minerals
    As US exits Afghanistan, China eyes $1 trillion in minerals current affairs
  • War in Crater,1864
    War of Crater,1864 History
  • New cold war, new compromises How Vladimir Putin provokes—and complicates—the struggle against autocracy As in the old cold war, ugly trade-offs are inevitabl
    New cold war, new compromises: How Vladimir Putin provokes—and complicates—the struggle against autocracy As in the old cold war, ugly trade-offs are inevitable. War in Europe
  • First information report, FIR
    First information report, FIR current affairs

Grounds for eviction of the tenant

Posted on August 5, 2022August 5, 2022 By Mohammad Arham
1 0
Read Time:9 Minute, 34 Second
Grounds of Eviction
Image sources: Public domain

Grounds for eviction of the tenant

In any suit for eviction on the ground mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (2), if at the first
hearing of the suit the tenant unconditionally pays or tenders to the landlord the entire amount
of rent and damages for use and occupation of the building due from him such damages for
use and occupation being calculated at the same rate as rent) together with interest thereon at
the rate of nine per cent per annum and the landlords’ costs of the suit in respect thereof, after
deducting therefrom any amount already deposited by the tenant under sub-section (1) of
section 30, the court may, in lieu of passing a decree for eviction on that ground, pass an
order relieving the tenant against his liability for eviction on that ground :
Provided that nothing in this sub-section, shall apply in relation to a tenant who or any
member of whose family has built or has otherwise acquired in a vacant state, or has got
vacated after acquisition. any residential building in the same city, municipality, notified area
or town area.


Section 20: Bar of suit for eviction of tenant except on specified
grounds-
(1) Save as provided in sub-section (2), or in clause (r) of subsection (2) of section 4a, no
suit shall be instituted for the eviction of a tenant from a building, notwithstanding the
determination of his tenancy by on the expiration of a notice to quit or in any other manner:
Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall bar a suit for the eviction of a tenant on the
determination of his tenancy by efflux of time where the tenancy for a fixed term was entered
into by or in pursuance of a compromise or adjustment arrived at with reference to a suit,
appeal, revision or execution proceeding. which is either recorded in court or otherwise
reduced to writing and signed by the tenant.
(2) A suit for the eviction of a tenant from a building after the determination of his tenancy
may be instituted on one or more of the following grounds, namely: –
(a) that the tenant is in arrears of rent for not less than four months. and has failed to pay the
same to the landlord within one month from the date of service upon him of a notice of
demand:
Provided that in relation to a tenant who is a member of the armed forces of the Union and in
whose Favour the prescribed authority under the Indian Soldiers (Litigation) Act, 1925 has
issued a certificate that he is serving under special conditions within the meaning of section 3
of that Act or where he has died by enemy action while so serving, then in relation to his
heirs, the words “four months” in this clause shall be deemed to have been substituted by the
words “one year”;
(b) that the tenant has willfully caused or permitted to be caused substantial damage to the
building;
(c) that the tenant has without the permission in writing of the landlord made or permitted to
be made any such construction or structural alteration in the building as is likely to diminish
its value or utility or to disfigure it;
(d) that the tenant has done any act which is inconsistent with the purpose for which he was
admitted to the tenancy of the building, or has without the consent in writing of the landlord

used it for a purpose other than such purpose, or has been convicted under any law for the time being in force of an offence of using the building or allowing it to be used for illegal or immoral purposes; (e) that the tenant has sub-let, in contravention of the provisions of section 25, or as the case may be, of the old Act, the whole or any part of the building; (f) that the tenant has renounced his character as such or denied the title of the landlord, and the latter has not waived his right of reentry or condoned the conduct of the tenant; (g) that the tenant was allowed to occupy the building as part of his contract of employment under the landlord, and his employment, has ceased. (3) In any suit under sub-section (2), the tenant shall, at or before the first hearing of the suit, deposit the entire amount of rent or damages for use and occupation admitted by him to be due, and thereafter throughout the continuance -of the suit, deposit regularly the amount of monthly rent or damages for use and occupation due at the rate of rent admitted by him, and in the event. ‘Of any default in this regard, the court may, unless after considering any representation made by him in that behalf it allows him further. time, on security being furnished for that amount., refuse to entertain any defense or, as the case may be, strike off his defense. Section 21: (Proceeding for release of building under occupation of tenant. – (1) The prescribed authority may, on an application of the landlord in that behalf, order the eviction of a tenant from the building under tenancy or any specified part thereof if it is satisfied that any of the following grounds exists namely- (a) that the building is bona fide required either in its existing form or after demolition and new construction by the landlord for occupation by himself or any member of his family, or any person for whose benefit it is held by him, either for residential purposes or for purposes of any profession, trade or calling, or where the landlord is the trustee of a public charitable trust, for the objects of the trust: (b) that the building is in a dilapidated condition and is required for purposes of demolition and new construction: Provided that where the building was in the occupation of a tenant since before its purchase by the landlord, such purchase being made after the commencement of this Act, no application shall be entertained on the grounds, mentioned in clause (a), unless a period of three years has elapsed since the date of such purchase and the landlord has given a notice in that behalf to the tenant not less than six months before such application, and such notice may be given even before the expiration of the aforesaid period of three years : Provided further that if any application under clause (a) is made in respect of any building in which the tenant is engaged in any profession, trade or calling, the prescribed authority while making the order of eviction shall, after considering all relevant facts of the case, award against the landlord to the tenant an amount equal to two years’ rent as compensation and may, subject to rules, impose such other conditions as he thinks fit: Provided also that no application under clause (a) shall be entertained

(I) for the purposes of a charitable trust, the objects of which provide for discrimination in
respect of its beneficiaries on the ground of religion, caste or place of birth;
(ii) in the case of any residential building, for occupation for business purposes:
(iii) in the case of any residential building, against any tenant who is a member of the armed
forces of the Union and in whose Favour the prescribed authority under the Indian Soldiers
(Litigation) Act, ‘1925 has Issued a certificate that he is serving under special conditions
within the meaning of section 3 of that Act, or where he has died by enemy action while so
serving then against his heirs.


Section 22: Appeal.-
Any person aggrieved by an order under section 21 or section 24 may within thirty days from
the date of the order prefer an appeal against it to the District Judge, and in other respects, the
provisions of section 18 shall mutatis mutandisapply in relation to such appeal.
Section 23: Enforcement eviction order-


(1) The prescribed authority may use or cause to be used such force as may be necessary for
evicting any tenant against whom an order is made under section 21 or on appeal under
section 22, as the case may be, or against any other person found in actual occupation, and for
putting the landlord into possession.
(2) Every order of the prescribed authority in proceedings under this section shall be final.
Section 24: Option of Cr-entry by tenant.-
(1) Where a building is released in Favour of the landlord and the tenant is evicted under
section 21 or on appeal under section 22, and the landlord either puts or causes to be put into
occupation thereof any person different from the person for whose occupation according to
the landlord’s representation, the building was required, or permits any such person to occupy
it, or otherwise puts it to any use other than the one for which it was released, or as the case
may be, omits to occupy it within one month or such extended period as the prescribed
authority may for sufficient cause allow from the date of his obtaining possession or, in the
case a building which was proposed to be occupied after some construction or reconstruction,
from the date of completion thereof, or in the case of a building which was proposed to be
demolished, omits to demolish it within two
months or such extended period as the prescribed authority may for sufficient cause allow
from the date of his obtaining possession, then the prescribed authority or, as the case may
be, the District Judge. may, on an application in that behalf within three months from the date
of such act or omission, order the landlord to place the evicted tenant in occupation of the
building on the original terms and conditions, and on such order being made, the landlord and
any person who may be in occupation thereof shall give vacant possession of the building to
the said tenant, failing which, the prescribed authority shall put him into possession and may
for that purpose use or cause to be used such force as may be necessary.
Section 26: Certain obligations of the landlord and tenant–
(1) No landlord shall without lawful authority or excuse cut off withhold or reduce any of the
amenities enjoyed by the tenant.

(2) The landlord shall be bound to keep the building under tenancy wind-proof and water-
proof and, subject to any contract in writing to the contrary, carry out periodical white-
washing and repairs.
(3) Subject to any contract in writing to the contrary, no tenant shall, whether during the
continuance of the tenancy or after its determination, demolish any improvement effected by
him in the building or remove any material used in such improvement, other than any fixtures
of a movable nature.
(4) The landlord shall give to the tenant a receipt for rent payable to and received by him.


Conclusion
The prescribed authority may, on an application of the tenant, serve upon the landlord a
notice requiring him, within such period, not exceeding one week, as may be specified in the
notice, to restore any amenity alleged to have been cut off, withheld or reduced in
contravention of sub-section (1) of section 26 or to show cause why an order under this
section be not passed against him.
If the landlord fails to restore the amenity within the said period, or to show sufficient cause,
the prescribed authority may by order permit the tenant to have the amenity restored at his
cost, and there upon the tenant shall be entitled to recover such cost as may be incurred by
him in pursuance of the order, by deduction from the rent payable to the landlord, after
furnishing to him the account of the expenditure, and nothing in section 6 shall be deemed to
apply to such cost.

Share

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

About Post Author

Mohammad Arham

mohammadarham142@gmail.com
http://legalresearchandanalysis.com
Happy
Happy
1 100 %
Sad
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 0 %
Article Tags:Eviction, Grounds of Eviction

Post navigation

Previous Post: Last rites of woman who died with a child in her lap at railway station performed
Next Post: POWER, FUNCTION, AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MUNICIPALITY IN THE U.P MUNICIPALITIES ACT, 1916

Related Posts

  • Internet privacy
    Internet privacy Article
  • SIR SYED AHMED KHAN AS A VOYAGE TO REFORMATIVE MODERNITY
    SIR SYED AHMED KHAN AS A VOYAGE TO REFORMATIVE MODERNITY Article
  • VISHAKA & OTHERS V. State of Rajasthan Article
  • INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RULES, 2021 Article
  • DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SIGNIFICANCE: POWER AND FUNCTIONS IN THE LIGHT OF UP URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 1973
    DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SIGNIFICANCE: POWER AND FUNCTIONS IN THE LIGHT OF UP URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 1973 Article
  • Cyberstalking and cyberbullying
    CYBERSTALKING LEGISLATION Article
  • FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN INDIA
    Case Analysis Of AV Mohan Rao v Kishan Rao Article
  • Legal aid
    ACCESS TO JUSTICE: ROLE OF LEGAL AID Article
  • PROSPECTUS UNDER COMPANY LAW 2013
    PROSPECTUS UNDER COMPANY LAW 2013 Article
  • Lessons from a Pandemic Article

Quick Search

Visit Our Store

Categories

RECENT POSTS

  • What’s wrong with Kenyan General Elections, why frontrunner former President Odinga is not accepting the Kenyan people’s election mandates? Former Attorney of Kenya, Mr. Taban Mohamed Explains.
  • America’s Role in helping the Indian Independence Movement
  • India Independence Day: The Surprising DIY Tech that powered India’s Freedom
  • Eknath Shinde, the Chief Minister of Maharashtra, assigned portfolios to his newly appointed ministers in the State Cabinet.
  • According to the President, unprecedented progress has been made in developing physical and digital infrastructure over the last few years.

Empirical Research

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsL2WcsDuRU

    Log in

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Sign up

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    • Have the Oscars lost their way?
      Have the Oscars lost their way? current affairs
    • Prisoners in Indian Jails
      Prisoners in Indian Jails Article
    • During President Donald Trump's term, many reconsidered China's technological capabilities.
      During President Donald Trump’s term, many reconsidered China’s technological capabilities. current affairs
    • Theodore Roosevelt Statue Removal Begins at Museum of Natural History. The removal of the statue of Theodore Roosevelt begins at the Natural History Museum Roosevelt's equestrian statue, which has evoked protests as a symbol of colonialism and racism, leaves the pedestal in ruins.
      Theodore Roosevelt Statue Removal Begins at Museum of Natural History current affairs
    • 2019–2021 Amaravati protests
      Amaravati protests 2019-2021 Article
    • The United Nations has failed to broaden aid consignments to dissent northwest Syria.
      The United Nations has failed to broaden aid consignments to dissent northwest Syria. current affairs
    • Landmark Judgement:-Mandal Case Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India(PIL SC 1992)
      Landmark Judgement:-Mandal Case
      Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India(PIL SC 1992)
      Judgement
    • DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SIGNIFICANCE: POWER AND FUNCTIONS IN THE LIGHT OF UP URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 1973
      DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SIGNIFICANCE: POWER AND FUNCTIONS IN THE LIGHT OF UP URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 1973 Article

    Copyright © 2022 Legal Research And Analysis.

    Powered by PressBook News WordPress theme

    Terms and Conditions