Posted on


Illegitimate signifies “something which is in opposition to law”. Illegitimate children as perceived are those kids who are not conceived out of legal wedlock. In addition to the general public, however, even the law has oppressed them in numerous ways. Since the days of yore, there is a social disgrace encompassing a youngster who isn’t brought into the world to lawfully married or wedded guardians. The Illegitimate child never appreciated equivalent status alongside the legitimate kids.

The country of an Illegitimate child has forever peered down and as result, the laws and customs from the past would not recognize and neglected to oblige the freedoms of kids. Notwithstanding, because of social and political progression, these laws have been evolving. Furthermore, presently less shame is related to such terms. In India, the new correction in sec.16 of the Hindu Marriage Act means the endeavor to change the singular laws to join this progression[1].

A family is characterized as “the fundamental unit in the public arena generally comprising of two guardians raising their youngsters”. As indicated by UNICEF, the kid is characterized as “an individual beneath the age of 18 years except if under the law material to the youngster, the larger part is achieved before”[2]. An authentic kid is conceived out of legitimate wedlock. While a kid is viewed as legitimate in the event that he isn’t conceived out of legitimate wedlock rather is a consequence of sexual connection between unmarried male and female.


The legitimacy status of a child in Hindu law is determined by the validity of the marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act, which applies to Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists as well. Under ordinary law, a child for being treated as legitimate must be born in lawful wedlock.

A Hindu marriage in India is voidable at the option of either party if it does not fulfill all the conditions provided in the section. 5 and section. 7 of Hindu Marriage Act,1955. Children born out of these marriages are termed “legitimate”. However, initially, the Hindu Marriage Act given that an offspring resulting from a marriage proclaimed void or revoked by the court will have a similar status as that of marriage. In any case, the courts have interpreted Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act in a different manner; the section was applicable only if a decree of nullity was passed by a court; in the absence of such a decree, the children remained illegitimate in the case of void marriages. This lacuna was later evacuated, after the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976, which revised Section 16. Presently, the children born out of all void and voidable marriages are deemed legitimate. In any case, the children conceived out of the void or voidable relationships can’t acquire the property of their family members.

Under the Hindu Law, if a marriage fulfills all the conditions laid down in Section 5 and Section 7  of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. it is considered to be a valid marriage Children born of such a valid marriage are alone considered legitimate. If the conditions lay down under Section 5 of the Act, are not satisfied, the resultant marriage may be void or voidable marriage as per Sections 11 and 12 of the Act.[3]


Before the coming into power of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, an illegitimate child of a Hindu was qualified for support out of his father’s coparcenary property and his self­ acquired property. The father will undoubtedly keep up with his illegitimate child during the time of his minority, regardless of the reality of whether or not he had any property. Among the Shudras, illegitimate children were qualified for upkeep assuming they couldn’t or get inherit or get a share on the partition. Assuming, in any case, the mother was not a Hindu, this right couldn’t be upheld under the Hindu law. The illegitimate child could, all things considered, continue against the putative father under the Code of Criminal Procedure.[4] Illegitimate girls had previously no cure under Hindu law. They were, notwithstanding, qualified for upkeep under the Code of Criminal Procedure, which right was enforceable just during the life­time of the putative father and ended on his passing.


An illegitimate child isn’t qualified to prevail over his dad. Be that as it may, under the Hindu Succession Act, illegitimate children are considered to be connected by illegitimate family relationship to their mom and to each other, and their legitimate relatives are considered to be connected by real connection to them and each other, and can accordingly acquire from one another under the said Act. An illegitimate child can acquire the property of their mother or of their illegitimate brother or sister[5]. A mother additionally can acquire the property of her illegitimate child. The father has no option to acquire the property of his illegitimate child.

Joint Family Property and Partition

Dissimilar to a legitimate child, an illegitimate child doesn’t secure any interest in the hereditary property in

the possession of his father; nor does he structure a coparcenary with him, so that during the life-time of his dad, the right of the legitimate child is simply restricted to upkeep. However, the dad may, in the course of his life, provide him with a portion of his property, which may be a share equal to that of the legitimate sons.[6]


A mother had a special right of guardianship. The mother is viewed as the natural guardian of an illegitimate child  The father reserved no option to the care of the illegitimate child during the letter’s minority, and usually, the mother of an illegitimate child reserved the option to the guardianship of the kid during the long periods of nurture.[7]



Under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, a Hindu is bound, during their lifetime, to keep up with their illegitimate children. The commitment to keep up with illegitimate children is currently upon both, the dad just as the mother. The illegitimate son, yet in addition an illegitimate daughter, is qualified to be kept up with by her father and mother..

The option to be kept up with, notwithstanding, expands just up to the time of minority. An illegitimate child isn’t qualified to be kept up with by their folks in the wake of achieving a larger part. Such a child will likewise not be qualified to be kept up within the event that the individual in question has stopped being a Hindu by changing to another religion.[8]

Besides, under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, an illegitimate child of a perished Hindu, in so far as he is a minor, and an illegitimate daughter of a deceased Hindu, in as much as she stays unmarried, are qualified to be kept up with by the successors to the perished out of the home acquired by them or by the people who take the domain of the perished.

Such a son or girl, in any case, won’t be qualified for support under the said Act in the event that the individual in question has stopped being a Hindu by transformation to another religion. An illegitimate child who has stopped being a Hindu can, in any case, apply for support from their father under the Code of Criminal Procedure.[9]


After the demise of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, an illegitimate offspring of a Shudra can’t acquire the property of their father.[10] Previously, an illegitimate child of a Shudra on the off chance that he was a dasiputra, was qualified to succeed to his father. Presently, under the Act, he can’t.

Joint Family Property and Partition:

Prior to the passing of the Hindu Succession Act, on the death of his father, an illegitimate son succeeded to his estate as a coparcener with the legitimate son of his father and was entitled to enforce a partition against the legitimate son. Now, under the said Act, however, he cannot succeed his father, as he is not related to him by legitimate kinship


The mother is viewed as the natural guardian. Presently, if both the guardians of an illegitimate child are Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, or Sikhs by religion, or then again on the off chance that one of the guardians of such youngster is a Hindu, Buddhist, Jain, or Sikh by religion, and such child is raised as an individual from the clan, local area, gathering or family to which such parent has a place or had a place, then, at that point, the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, applies to such a child, and under section 6 of the Act, on account of an illegitimate child or ill-conceived unmarried young lady, the mother is the natural guardian, and after her, the father is the natural guardian, in the case of a married girl, the husband is the natural guardian.

However, under that Act, such a guardian is not qualified to go about thusly, assuming the individual had stopped to be Hindu or has totally lastly denied the world by turning into a loner or a plain.[11]


In Thrumurthi Ranayammal v. Thrumurthi Muthamal, the Madras High Court noticed, “the phrasings of Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, to the extent that it is applicable to a marriage void under Section 11, prompts an irregular and surprising position which couldn’t have been considered by the council. The position and status of an offspring of void marriage ought to clearly be similar whether the marriage has pronounced a nullity under Section 11 or in any case.[12]

In Shanta Ram v. Smt. Dargubai, the Bombay High Court saw that the offspring of void relationships would be considered genuine, regardless of the pronouncement of nullity despite the fact that they would not secure the right to progression similarly as is accessible to the offspring of legitimate marriage.[13]


The other gathering in the general public comprises of individuals who are sane and liberal in their standpoint and don’t think about wrongness as a disgrace. They don’t fault an ill-conceived kid for his/her reality rather faults the flighty couple. The laws in the general public are additionally being revised likewise as the time and the circumstance requests.

There is a should be more liberal towards the ill-conceived youngsters and the laws ought to likewise be revised so that they have the wellbeing of the relative multitude of individuals on the most fundamental level.

The inheritance rights of illegitimate children are governed by Section 16 (3) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, which states that ‘such children are only entitled to the property of their parents and not of any other relation’. This implies that an illegitimate child would only have the right to his father’s self-acquired property, not his ancestral property. However, according to a Supreme Court ruling in 2011, children born out of wedlock have the right to stake a claim to their father’s self-acquired property