Posted on


The right to information act was passed in the year 2005. This law enables Indian residents to look for any available data from a Public Authority and makes the Government and its functionaries more responsible and dependable. Right to Information also connects with occupants to official evaluate any Government work or to take the case of material used in any work. Right to Information is a piece of key honors under Article 19(1) of the Constitution. Article 19 (1) says that every inhabitant has the privilege to talk unreservedly of talk and enunciation.

Regardless of the way that RTI is a key right, still we need RTI Act to give us this right. This is since, assuming that you went to any Government Department and told the authority there, “RTI is my significant right and that I am the master of this country. Thusly, assuming no one minds, show me all of your reports”, he would not do that. Doubtlessly, he would remove you from his room. Appropriately, we truly need an equipment or a cycle through which we can rehearse this significant right. Right to Information Act 2005, which became convincing on thirteenth October 2005, gives that equipment. Subsequently, Right to Information Act doesn’t give us any new right. It essentially sets out the cycle on the most effective way to apply for information, where to apply, how much costs, etc.


The RTI Laws were first effectively authorized by the state legislatures — Tamil Nadu (1997), Goa (1997), Rajasthan (2000), Karnataka (2000), Delhi (2001), Maharashtra (2002), Madhya Pradesh (2003), Assam (2002) and Jammu and Kashmir (2004). The Maharashtra and Delhi State level institutions are considered to have been the most generally utilized. The Delhi and J&K Right to Information Acts are as yet in power. The principal draft of the Right to Information Bill was introduced to Parliament on 22 December 2004. After extreme discussion, in excess of 100 changes to the draft Bill were made between December 2004 and 15 June 2005, when the bill at long last passed. The Act came completely into impact on 13 October 2005. The Act covers the entire of India aside from Jammu and Kashmir. It is pertinent to all protected specialists, including the leader, governing body and legal executive; any organization or body set up or established by a demonstration of Parliament or a state council. It is additionally characterized in the Act that bodies or specialists set up or established by request or warning of suitable government including bodies “claimed, controlled or significantly financed” by government, or non-Government associations “considerably financed, straightforwardly or in a roundabout way by reserves” given by the public authority are likewise canvassed in the Act’s ambit.


  • The essential object of the Right to Information Act is to engage the residents, advance straightforwardness and responsibility in the working of the Government, contain debasement, and make our majority rules system work for individuals in genuine sense. An educated populace will be better prepared to keep essential vigil on the instruments of government and make the public authority more responsible to the represented.
  • To enable the citizen to get access to information which is under the control of the government and its authorities.
  • To promote accountability and transparency in the administrative functioning of the government and public bodies and thereby curbing corruption.
  • To establish a central information commission and a state Information commission for the proper implementation and monitoring of the Act and Rules made there under.
  • To impose a paramount duty on the public authorities to make available to the public as much information as possible.
  • To penalize and punish the Public Information Officer (IPO) for not fulfilling his duty as prescribed under this Act.

Thus the main purpose behind the enactment of the RTI Act is to mandate the public authority to provide each and every information to the public relating to the functioning of the government which helps in bringing transparency and make citizens more informed.


The Central RTI Act stretches out to the entire of India with the exception of the State of Jammu and Kashmir. All bodies, which are comprised under the Constitution or under any law or under any Government notice or all bodies, including NGOs, which are possessed, controlled or significantly financed by the Government are covered.

Every private body, which are possessed, controlled or significantly financed by the Government are straightforwardly covered. Others are by implication covered. That is assuming an administration office can get to 1information from any private body under some other Act, the equivalent can be gotten to by the resident under the RTI Act through that administration division.


The Parliament perceived that legitimate and effective working of a vote based system requires an educated populace and straightforwardness regarding data and that such straightforwardness is imperative for actually taking a look at defilement and to consider administration and their instrumentalities responsible to the resident of the country. The Parliament was additionally cognizant that irregular and uncontrolled disclosure of data is probably going to struggle with other public interests including productive tasks of the administration, ideal utilization of restricted monetary assets and protection of classification of touchy data.

In its undertaking to adjust and fit these clashing interests while safeguarding the centrality of the popularity based thought, the Parliament instituted the RTI Act. The object of the RTI Act is to set out a down to earth system of right to data for residents to tie down admittance to data heavily influenced by open specialists, to advance straightforwardness and responsibility in the working of public specialists.

Sec. 4: of the Act forces a commitment on open specialists to keep up with its records appropriately listed and filed in a way and structure which works with the right to data under the Act.

Sec. 6: of the Act entitles an individual envious of getting any data under the Act, to make a solicitation recorded as a hard copy to the Central or State Public Information Officer indicating the points of interest of the data looked for by him. The candidate isn’t needed to give any explanation regarding the reason why he is mentioning for the data.

Sec. 7: of the Act requires the Public Information Officer to either give the data or reject the solicitation for any of the reasons indicated in Secs. 8 and 9 inside 30 days of receipt of the solicitation. Assuming that the Officer neglects to give a choice on the solicitation inside 30 days, he will be considered to have rejected the solicitation

Sec. 19: Under this section  in case an individual doesn’t get a choice inside 30 days or is distressed by a choice of the Public Information Officer, he might lean toward an allure for a senior in rank Officer to the Public Information Officer in that Public Authority.

A subsequent allure is accommodated against the request passed in the main allure before the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission by and large. The powers of the Information Commission are sanctioned in Sub-Sec. 9 of Sec. 19 which incorporates the ability to require the Public Authority to remunerate the complainant for any misfortune or other disservice endured and additionally to force any of the punishments gave under the RTI Act.

Sec. 20 of the Act enables the Information Commission to force punishment on the Public Information Officer in case the Commission is of the assessment that the Officer with no sensible reason would not get an application for data or has not outfitted the data looked for inside the predefined time under Sec. 7(1) or mala fidely denied the solicitation for data or intentionally has given mistaken, fragmented or deluding data or annihilated data which was the subject of the solicitation or hindered in any way in outfitting the data.

Sec. 22 of the Act is a non-obstante proviso giving superseding impact to the arrangements of the     Act.

Under Sec. 25, the Information Commission is needed after the finish of every year to set up a report on the execution of the arrangements of the Act during that year and forward a duplicate thereof to the fitting Government.


RTI Act Prescribes time limit under which the reply need to be given by Public Information Officer.

  • For PIO to reply to application: 30 days from date of receipt of application
  • For PIO to transfer to another PA under Sec 6(3): 5 days from date of receipt of application
  • For PIO to issue notice to 3rd Party: 5 days from date of receipt of application
  • For 3rd Party to make a representation to PIO: 10 days from receipt of notice from PIO
  • For PIO to reply to application if 3rdParty involved : 40 days from date of receipt of application
  • For applicant to make First Appeal: 30 days from date of receipt of PIO’s reply or from date when reply was to be received
  • For First Appellate Authority to pass an order: 30 days from receipt of First Appeal OR Maximum 45 days, if reasons for delay are given in writing
  • For applicant to make Second Appeal before CIC/SIC: 90 days from receipt of First Appeal orders or from the date when orders were to be received

For CIC/SIC to decide Second Appeal: No time limit specified


  • An application can be rejected if the disclosure of information
  • affects the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of India or would lead to incitement of an offence. [S.2.(8)(a)]
  • is forbidden to be published by any court, tribunal or if disclosure may constitute contempt of court. [S.2.(8)(b)]
  • including information such as trade secrets, commercial confidence, intellectual property. [S.2.(8)(d)


This is on the grounds that, or the initial time throughout the entire existence of free India, there is a law which projects an immediate responsibility on the official for non-execution. On the off chance that the concerned official doesn’t give data on schedule, a punishment of Rs 250 every day of postponement can be forced by the Information Commissioner. Assuming the data gave is bogus, a punishment of a limit of Rs 25,000/ – can be forced. A punishment can likewise be forced for giving fragmented or to dismissing your application for malafide reasons. This fine is deducted from the official’s very own compensation.


The Act endorses the commitments of a Public Information Officer (PIO), Assistant Public Information Officer (APIO) and different officials as follows:

  • If a data looked for by anybody is in regards to his life or freedom, such RTI is necessary to be replied inside a time span of 48 hours of the receipt of the solicitation.
  • If out of different data looked for, a couple are being replied by PIO then, at that point, it is the obligation of Public Information Officer (PIO) to give a justification behind not giving the total records requested and privileges of the candidate as for survey of the choice with respect to non-exposure of part of the data.
  • On admittance to data, the RTI Act engages resident with the privileges comparable to an individual from Parliament. The data which can’t be denied to any individual from Parliament or State assembly can’t be denied to any individual looking for RTI.
  • It is the obligation of PIO to suo motu (all alone) proclaim data, for example, referenced in the comprehensive rundown of segment 4 of RTI Act.

Partner Public Information Officer

  • Assistant public data official assume an enormous part to get applications for data or requests under the Act for sending the equivalent forthwith to the Central Public Information Officer 2 or the State Public Information Officer, Appellate Officer or the CentraI data Commission or the State Information Commission, as the case might be [Section 5 (2)].

Official whose Assistance is Sought

  • It is the obligation and responsibiliyt of other data official to deliver all help to the Public Information Officer who looked for their help; • to be treated as a Public Information Officer for the reasons for any contradiction of the arrangements of the Act. [Section 5 (5)]

RTI Act was passed by Indian Parliament on fifteenth June 2005, which came into power completely on twelfth October 2005, to permit average citizens to get to one side of “Right to Information.” There had been such a large number of contentions, there had been battles at the same time, RTI Act has arranged our lives in a manner nothing else could.


The essential object of this Act is to empower the opportunities of occupants to make explicit inquiries on the working of the Government equipment, to propel straightforwardness and efficiency in the exercises of such Government relationship, to coordinate pollution and besides to make greater part administers framework to work for our inhabitants. The Act holds the Government back from being controlled as in it makes an idea that the Government and its concerned wings are working for everybody at large. It similarly appears to be alright that no people ought to be ignorant of their fundamental honors as the occupants of this country and the Act furthermore makes it mandatory that the information which is given to the applicants ought to be steady with the best of the data on the concerned specialists and any kind of controls done against the courses of action of the Act will incite explicit corrective liabilities upon the person who manhandles it.