Skip to content
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ADVISORY BOARD
  • GOVERNING BODY
  • IT DEPARTMENT
  • CERTIFICATE COURSE IN RESEARCH WRITING Session 2022
  • LRA-WOMEN
  • CONTENTS
  • EVENTS
  • LRA LAW FIRM
  • Pin Posts
  • LR&A Encyclopedia
Legal Research And Analysis

Legal Research And Analysis

In these dark and despair moments, Legal Research & Analysis Stands undeterred for Ukraine people and it's Sovereignty. Love and Peace for Ukraine, Slava Ukraini!

  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
    • FOUNDING MEMBERS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ADVISORY BOARD
  • GOVERNING BODY
  • IT DEPARTMENT
    • PRIVACY POLICY
  • CERTIFICATE COURSE IN RESEARCH WRITING Session 2022
  • LRA-WOMEN
    • LRAWOMEN Volunteers Program
  • CONTENTS
    • LRASJ
    • ARTICLES
    • Opinions & Special Articles
    • BLOG
    • JOURNAL
      • VOLUME 1, ISSUE 1
    • EMPIRICAL RESEARCH
    • LRA Current Affairs
    • LRA E ARCHIVES
    • Picture stories
  • EVENTS
    • CAMPUS AMBASSADOR
    • CERTIFICATE COURSE IN RESEARCH WRITING Session 2022
    • LRA INTERNSHIP PROGRAM IN LEGAL JOURNALISM
    • Third National Blog writing competition
  • LRA LAW FIRM
  • Pin Posts
  • LR&A Encyclopedia
  • Toggle search form
Some facts about Sports Law

Recent Cases related to Sports Law

Posted on May 16, 2022May 16, 2022 By Sankalp Mirani
0 0
Read Time:1 Minute, 3 Second
Recent Cases related to Sports Law
Some facts about Sports Law

Recent Cases related to Sports Law

Zee Telefilms & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. (2005) 4 SCC 649

Judges:
Justice N. Santosh Hegde, Justice S.N. Variava, Justice B.P. Singh, Justice H.K. Sema, Justice S.B. Sinha

Facts of the case:

Zee Telefilms Ltd. is a sports channel that has subscribers throughout the World. The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) had cancelled telecast rights granted to Zee, in an arbitrary fashion. The board cancelled the entire tender process to determine telecasting rights for all matches played in between 2004 to 2008. The petitioner, Zee Telefilms Ltd. approached the Hon’ble Court under Article 32 against BCCI regarding the cancellation of telecasting rights.

Issues:

  1. Whether or not the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) was ‘State’ within the meaning of Article 12?
  2. Whether or not the writ petition filed under Article 32 by Zee Telefilms Ltd. against the BCCI is maintainable?

Judgement of the case:

In the present case, the Apex Court of the country ruled that BCCI does not fall within the ambit of Article 12. For the same reason, it was held that the writ petition was not maintainable and it was accordingly dismissed.

Share

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

About Post Author

Sankalp Mirani

sankalpmirani610@gmail.com
https://legalresearchandanalysis.com/
Happy
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 0 %
Sports Law Tags:Recent Cases related to Sports Law, Sports Law

Post navigation

Previous Post: “Money doesn’t talk, it swears:” Why Delhi Court invoked Bob Dylan to refuse bail to ex-NSE head Chitra Ramkrishna; LEGAL UPDATES
Next Post: NCDRC is ‘tribunal’; writ petition under Article 227 in High Court maintainable against NCDRC order: Supreme Court

Quick Search

Visit Our Store

Categories

RECENT POSTS

  • Recent cases related to Tax Law
  • PM Modi and Russian President Putin spoke; about Challenges. These challenges include the situation in Ukraine and the state of the global energy and food markets.
  • California wildfire burns over 900 acres hundreds of homes threatened
  • North Korea says ‘Alien things’ near the border with the South are the reason for the Covid outbreak.
  • What is Hajj? We Explain

Empirical Research

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsL2WcsDuRU

    Log in

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Sign up

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Copyright © 2022 Legal Research And Analysis.

    Powered by PressBook WordPress theme

    Terms and Conditions