Skip to content
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ADVISORY BOARD
  • GOVERNING BODY
  • IT DEPARTMENT
  • CERTIFICATE COURSE IN RESEARCH WRITING Session 2022
  • LRA-WOMEN
  • CONTENTS
  • EVENTS
  • LRA LAW FIRM
  • Pin Posts
Legal Research And Analysis

Legal Research And Analysis

In these dark and despair moments, Legal Research & Analysis Stands undeterred for Ukraine people and it's Sovereignty. Love and Peace for Ukraine, Slava Ukraini!

  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
    • FOUNDING MEMBERS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ADVISORY BOARD
  • GOVERNING BODY
  • IT DEPARTMENT
    • PRIVACY POLICY
  • CERTIFICATE COURSE IN RESEARCH WRITING Session 2022
  • LRA-WOMEN
    • LRAWOMEN Volunteers Program
  • CONTENTS
    • LRASJ
    • ARTICLES
    • Opinions & Special Articles
    • BLOG
    • JOURNAL
      • VOLUME 1, ISSUE 1
    • EMPIRICAL RESEARCH
    • LRA Current Affairs
    • LRA E ARCHIVES
    • Picture stories
  • EVENTS
    • CAMPUS AMBASSADOR
    • CERTIFICATE COURSE IN RESEARCH WRITING Session 2022
    • LRA INTERNSHIP PROGRAM IN LEGAL JOURNALISM
    • Third National Blog writing competition
  • LRA LAW FIRM
  • Pin Posts
  • Toggle search form
The Supreme Court, while quashing the criminal proceedings against a woman, said that there should be at least some factual supporting material for the allegations made in the FIR. The complainant's case recorded in the FIR was as follows: The accused married the complainant's brother on 11th December 2016 and thereafter she began to harass her brother mentally and physically and this was the reason why her brother died on 8th December 2016 He died suddenly on the job in 2017.

Refusing to quash criminal proceedings, HC cannot issue directions for ‘no arrest’ or ‘no coercive action’ till final report is filed: Supreme Court reiterates

Posted on March 8, 2022April 6, 2022 By Sabina Nafees Nafees
0 0
Read Time:2 Minute, 27 Second
Refusing to quash criminal proceedings, HC cannot issue directions for 'no arrest' or 'no coercive action' till final report is filed: Supreme Court reiterates
Images; Picture; Representative image/ Sources LRA E ARCHIVES 

Refusing to quash criminal proceedings, HC cannot issue directions for ‘no arrest’ or ‘no coercive action’ till final report is filed: Supreme Court reiterates

The Supreme Court, while refusing to quash criminal proceedings, said the Supreme Court, while refusing to quash the criminal proceedings, cannot issue directions for “no arrest” or “no coercive action” till the final report is filed.

A bench of Justice MR Shah and Justice BV Nagarathna observed that the Supreme Court rejected the practice of passing orders of “no arrest” or “no coercive action” when the petition to be dismissed was itself dismissed.

The bench said,

“In the case of “Niharika Infrastructure Pvt Ltd Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors., 2021 SCC Online sc 315”, this Court has rejected the practice where such practice of “no arrest” or “no coercive action” by the High Courts. Unless the High Court in exercise of powers under Section 482 of the CrPC and/or Article 226 of the Constitution of India has refused to quash the criminal proceedings.

Niharika Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v State of Maharashtra & Ors LL 2021 SC 211, Supreme Court had asked the High Courts not to pass such orders, “We caution the High Courts against passing such orders again.” that “no coercive step should be taken” until the investigation is completed and the final report is not filed, while the dismissal petitions under Section 482 CrPC and Article 226 of the Constitution of India are not entertained. is done.

The accused in a criminal writ petition filed in PS Noida Sector-49, Gautam Budh Nagar under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B Indian Penal Code seeking quashing of the FIR dated 19.11.2019, Allahabad High Court had knocked on the door.

It was submitted that two maternal uncles of the accused were killed and they are eye-witnesses of these murders. As the accused and their family members feared a threat to their lives from the alleged murders, U.P. He was provided with a gunner.

️Gunner has withdrawn on 01.09.2008 under pressure from the government’s alleged killers on the orders of the High Court. It was claimed that the FIR was registered on a complaint that protection was obtained by the accused from the High Court by forged documents and from the FIR, it was argued that no offense could be made out against the accused. , AGA Appeared on behalf of the State that the FIR discloses a cognizable offense.

The High Court had directed as follows,

️ “It is directed that both the petitioners i.e. Amit Yadav and Arun Yadav shall not be arrested in the above case unless a police report under section 173(2) CrPC, if any, is submitted.” But he will cooperate in the investigation of the matter.”

Case Title: Priyanka Yadav Vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Criminal Appeal No. 292 of 2022

Share

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

About Post Author

Sabina Nafees Nafees

Sabuuu788@gmail.com
https://legalresearchandanalysis.com/
Happy
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 0 %
Covering the Supreme Court of India Tags:Supreme court

Post navigation

Previous Post: CURRENT AFFAIRS; Ten Seconds readouts
Next Post: The cost of misogyny; Societies that treat women badly are poorer and less stable Oppressing women not only hurts women; it also hurts men.

Quick Search

Visit Our Store

Categories

RECENT POSTS

  • In Mexico, A Journalist was killed in the latest attack on Media Workers.
  • Palestinians convey a 100m letter to the Red Cross explaining Israel’s violations against detainees.
  • Manipur debris flow: 8 bodies discovered, many missing; rescue efforts underway
  • Beijing has kept mum on reports that Islamabad has appealed to China’s desire to take over the security of its nationals and securities in Pakistan.
  • Tests of the headlong superfluous aerial target Abhyas by India off the coast of Odisha were effective.

Empirical Research

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsL2WcsDuRU

    Log in

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Sign up

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Copyright © 2022 Legal Research And Analysis.

    Powered by PressBook WordPress theme

    Terms and Conditions