Skip to content
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ADVISORY BOARD
  • GOVERNING BODY
  • IT DEPARTMENT
  • CERTIFICATE COURSE IN RESEARCH WRITING Session 2022
  • LRA-WOMEN
  • CONTENTS
  • EVENTS
  • LRA LAW FIRM
  • Pin Posts
Legal Research And Analysis

Legal Research And Analysis

In these dark and despair moments, Legal Research & Analysis Stands undeterred for Ukraine people and it's Sovereignty. Love and Peace for Ukraine, Slava Ukraini!

  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
    • FOUNDING MEMBERS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ADVISORY BOARD
  • GOVERNING BODY
  • IT DEPARTMENT
    • PRIVACY POLICY
  • CERTIFICATE COURSE IN RESEARCH WRITING Session 2022
  • LRA-WOMEN
    • LRAWOMEN Volunteers Program
  • CONTENTS
    • LRASJ
    • ARTICLES
    • Opinions & Special Articles
    • BLOG
    • JOURNAL
      • VOLUME 1, ISSUE 1
    • EMPIRICAL RESEARCH
    • LRA Current Affairs
    • LRA E ARCHIVES
    • Picture stories
  • EVENTS
    • CAMPUS AMBASSADOR
    • CERTIFICATE COURSE IN RESEARCH WRITING Session 2022
    • LRA INTERNSHIP PROGRAM IN LEGAL JOURNALISM
    • Third National Blog writing competition
  • LRA LAW FIRM
  • Pin Posts
  • Toggle search form
Ukraine’s government is willing to make big concessions to end the war, But it doubts that Russia is negotiating in good faith.

Ukraine’s government is willing to make big concessions to end the war, But it doubts that Russia is negotiating in good faith.

Posted on March 24, 2022April 5, 2022 By Mohd Uzair
0 0
Read Time:4 Minute, 59 Second
Ukraine’s government is willing to make big concessions to end the war, But it doubts that Russia is negotiating in good faith.
Images; Picture; Representative image/ Sources LRA E ARCHIVES
Images; Picture; Representative image/ Sources LRA E ARCHIVES

Talking and fighting

Ukraine’s government is willing to make big concessions to end the war

But it doubts that Russia is negotiating in good faith


AT A SECRET location in a blacked-out highrise in the suburbs of Kyiv, a senior Ukrainian intelligence officer shared what he claimed was Russia’s invasion blueprint. The classified document, supposedly compiled before Russian troops crossed the border, envisages the complete takeover of Ukraine: seizing private property and taking over banks, transport, ports, and elected institutions. There are provisions for a federation of puppet “peoples’ republics” and perhaps their annexation into Russia if needed. There is a line about “denazify” the Ukrainian education system, whatever that means.

Compared with this totalitarian wishlist, peace negotiations with Russia appear to be headed to a more reasonable place. Russia is making four main demands: a declaration of Ukrainian neutrality; Ukraine’s formal acceptance that Crimea, which Russia seized in 2014, is Russian territory and that the Donbas region in eastern Ukraine, which is controlled by separatists backed by Russia, is independent; the demilitarisation of Ukraine; and relief for Russia from Western sanctions. Ukraine, for its part, appears ready to agree to several of these demands, including giving up on the prospect of NATO membership and accepting some sort of compromise on the occupied territories. Turkish and Israeli interlocutors are hailing what they describe as progress bringing the two sides together.

But there are two big sticking points. The first is Russia’s maximalist definition of demilitarisation. It wants Ukraine to reduce its army to 50,000, a fifth of its current size. After a month of bloody sacrifice, few in Ukraine are anywhere near ready to agree to such a cut. The second is the Ukrainian belief that Vladimir Putin will not pull his forces from areas of eastern and southern Ukraine they have conquered, or are about to conquer. There is a bitter experience here: Russian troops remained in Donbas despite being required to withdraw under the Minsk agreements of 2014-15.

Secondary discussions relate to the scope of new security guarantees for Ukraine. The talk has been of a formula involving the five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Turkey; yet it is far from clear that the Western members (America, Britain, and France) are ready to provide the unconditional guarantees that Ukraine is seeking. Both sides have agreed to keep the details of the talks secret. Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has already indicated that any proposed settlement would be subject to a referendum. The Kremlin’s immediate response to this idea was to say that progress had become “slower and less substantive than needed”. Russian approval for any deal would no doubt come more quickly, dependent as it is on the will of just one person. But it remains to be seen whether Mr. Putin is really ready to compromise, or indeed whether his negotiators have a genuine mandate.

With a revealing pause and nervous laugh, the intelligence official said it was Russia’s questionable sincerity that made him pessimistic about the prospects of the negotiations. They might offer the best opportunity to avoid the “nightmarish” scenario of a protracted conflict and “Syriaisation”, or division of Ukraine into warring regions, he said. But Mr. Putin did not appear to be taking the talks anywhere near as seriously as Ukraine is. That was clear in the “second-tier” negotiation team he sent. “Moscow has always used peace talks to manipulate the agenda. Just like they have accused us of bombing our own people and homes.” The official predicted that Russia would continue an offensive to secure gains in the south and east of the country, completing its brutal siege of the port of Mariupol, before attempting to deny Ukraine access to the sea altogether with a renewed assault on Odesa.

Ukraine’s negotiating position has been strengthened by Russia’s surprisingly mediocre military performance. The level of professionalism has varied greatly: better in units facing Ukraine’s elite forces in the south-east, much worse in the north and north-east and around Kyiv. There, Russian planners appear to have badly miscalculated, adopting a military posture that assumed minimal resistance. What is more, they failed to prepare adequately even for that rosy scenario. The intelligence officer said that Russia had gone ahead with its attack without even elementary coordination of its military units. It was a “miraculous” display of negligence or sabotage, he said, which has had predictable consequences in the numbers of dead and injured.

Ukraine says Russia has lost more than 15,000 soldiers since the start of the conflict, a claim that many assume to be a wild exaggeration. But on March 21st a report in Komsomolskaya Pravda, a reliably pro-government Russian newspaper, suggested that as many as 9,861 Russian soldiers had died so far, with a further 16,153 wounded. That would put roughly 13% of the original invasion force out of action, and compares badly with the total losses endured by the Soviet Union during a decade of war in Afghanistan when some 15,000 died. The Russian tabloid later claimed that it had been hacked and removed the numbers. But even if the report was not correct, the rate of attrition seems high enough to give the Kremlin an incentive to seek a negotiated peace.

Mr. Zelensky has once again called for a face-to-face meeting with Mr. Putin, who has so far turned down the chance to talk. Negotiations had to succeed, Mr. Zelensky said because the alternative was a “third world war”. His intelligence officer was less optimistic, predicting that war would continue until Russian forces were “completely exhausted”. Did Ukraine have the resources to bring that about? “We have to have them,” he said. “Because we don’t have an option. We want to stay alive.”

Share

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

About Post Author

Mohd Uzair

cj34uzair@gmail.com
https://legalresearchandanalysis.com/
Happy
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
Angry
0 0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 0 %
War in Europe Tags:But it doubts that Russia is negotiating in good faith, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine’s government is willing to make big concessions to end the war

Post navigation

Previous Post: CURRENT AFFAIRS: Ten Seconds readouts
Next Post: Historically, global climate change scientists, analysis and policymakers have struggled with a way to make the vital connections between gender, social equity, and climate change.

Quick Search

Visit Our Store

Categories

RECENT POSTS

  • In Mexico, A Journalist was killed in the latest attack on Media Workers.
  • Palestinians convey a 100m letter to the Red Cross explaining Israel’s violations against detainees.
  • Manipur debris flow: 8 bodies discovered, many missing; rescue efforts underway
  • Beijing has kept mum on reports that Islamabad has appealed to China’s desire to take over the security of its nationals and securities in Pakistan.
  • Tests of the headlong superfluous aerial target Abhyas by India off the coast of Odisha were effective.

Empirical Research

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsL2WcsDuRU

    Log in

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Sign up

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Copyright © 2022 Legal Research And Analysis.

    Powered by PressBook WordPress theme

    Terms and Conditions