Skip to content
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • ADVISORY BOARD
  • FOUNDING MEMBERS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ADVISORY BOARD
  • GOVERNING BODY
  • LRA INTERNSHIP PROGRAM IN LEGAL JOURNALISM
  • LRA-WOMEN
  • CONTENTS
  • EVENTS
  • CAMPUS AMBASSADOR
  • LRA LAW FIRM
  • IT DEPARTMENT
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • Third National Blog writing competition
Legal Research And Analysis

Legal Research And Analysis

In these dark and despair moments, Legal Research & Analysis Stands undeterred for Ukraine people and it's Sovereignty. Love and Peace for Ukraine, Slava Ukraini!

  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • ADVISORY BOARD
  • FOUNDING MEMBERS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ADVISORY BOARD
  • GOVERNING BODY
  • LRA INTERNSHIP PROGRAM IN LEGAL JOURNALISM
  • LRA-WOMEN
    • LRAWOMEN Volunteers Program
  • CONTENTS
    • LRASJ
    • ARTICLES
    • Opinions & Special Articles
    • BLOG
    • JOURNAL
      • VOLUME 1, ISSUE 1
    • EMPIRICAL RESEARCH
    • LRA Current Affairs
    • LRA E ARCHIVES
    • Picture stories
  • EVENTS
    • CERTIFICATE COURSE IN RESEARCH WRITING
  • CAMPUS AMBASSADOR
  • LRA LAW FIRM
  • IT DEPARTMENT
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • Third National Blog writing competition
  • Toggle search form

Tag: Juvenile Justice Act

No difference between bailable and non-bailable while granting bail to juveniles under section, 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act: Uttarakhand High Court

Posted on February 19, 2022April 6, 2022 By Sabina Nafees Nafees
No difference between bailable and non-bailable while granting bail to juveniles under section, 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act: Uttarakhand High Court

In the light of Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act (JJ Act), 2015, the Uttarakhand High Court held that any person, who is expressly a child, shall be subject to production of surety or is entitled to be released on bail unconditionally or shall be placed under the supervision of a probationary officer or under the care of a qualified person.

current affairs, Uttarakhand High Court

Quick Search

Visit Our Store

Categories

RECENT POSTS

  • CHANGING TRENDS IN RULES OF
    CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION
  • Procedure for Release of building under the U.P. Urban Building Act 1972
  • Presumption under Section 29 POCSO Act does not discharge prosecution of duty to prove case: Bombay High Court; LEGAL UPDATES
  • Shaikh Ahmad Deedat- The Great Man
  • NCDRC is ‘tribunal’; writ petition under Article 227 in High Court maintainable against NCDRC order: Supreme Court

Empirical Research

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsL2WcsDuRU

    Log in

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Sign up

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Copyright © 2022 Legal Research And Analysis.

    Powered by PressBook WordPress theme

    Terms and Conditions