Stay Connected ! Stay Informed !
The Ayodhya dispute which is also known as ‘Ram Janmabhoomi Vivad’ was one of the most famous disputes in the socio-religious history of India. The dispute was related to the plot of land in the district Ayodhya, U.P, which is regarded as the birthplace of Bhagwan Ram.
Hindus believe that in the sixteenth century the Babur demolished the temple situated at the birthplace of Ram and built a Mosque which is known as Babri Masjid.
The Supreme Court observed that by overturning the exparte decree, the defendants can be allowed to be involved in the suit proceedings and cross-examine witnesses.
The defendants, in this case, were set ex parte by the Trial Court. The Trial Court also dismissed their application under Order IX Rule 13.
The doctrine of estoppel is based upon the grounds of public policy, fair dealing, good faith, and justice, and its purpose is to forbid one to speak against his own act, representations, or commitments to the injury of one to whom they were directed and who reasonably relied thereon upon. Said doctrine springs from equitable principles and the equities of the case.
W.P. No. 15262(W) of 2018 Calcutta High Court Date 6th September 2019, The Hon’ble Justice Shekhar B. Saraf Jurisdiction Application under Article 226 of Constitution for Non payment of Provident Fund and incorrect date of resignation on Pension Payment Order(PPO) Book maintained by Respondent Company. Facts of the case On 5th December 1995 show cause…
Read More “Mr. Arani Mukhopadhy v. Employee Provident Fund & Ors.” »
