In these dark and despair moments, Legal Research & Analysis Stands undeterred for Ukraine people and it's Sovereignty. Love and Peace for Ukraine, Slava Ukraini!
On this day in 1914: Two shots in Sarajevo ignited the fires of war and drew Europe toward World War I. Just hours after narrowly escaping an assassin’s bomb, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, and his wife, the Duchess of Hohenberg, are killed by Gavrilo Princip.
US President Joe Biden has announced a G7 project to rival China’s formidable Belt and Road Initiative, BRI, by raising some $600 billion for global infrastructure programs in poor countries. The plan, which relaunches a first attempt unveiled during last year’s G7, will target countries desperately needing everything from roads to harbors – and until now often relying on the Chinese.
Thousands affected by a deadly earthquake in eastern Afghanistan are in need of clean water and food and are at risk of disease, the Afghan health ministry has warned.
The officials had managed medicines for now, but handling those who had lost their homes would be a challenge, said Afghanistan’s health ministry spokesperson Sharafat Zaman on June 26.
Distinction Between Condition and Warranty
Taliban called the female employees of the Ministry of Finance; they had been fired and that they should introduce their husband or brother to work in the ministry instead.
Indian startups created value , wealth even during pandemic: PM Modi.
Law student moves Bombay High Court seeking uniform examination pattern in Maharashtra Universities
Delhi High Court asks State government, SHO to explain why CCTV in police station does not have audio
It is often not realized that among the causes of Kashmir problem – inclusion of plebiscite in the Instrument of Accession, reference of Kashmir to UN, halting Indian offensive when it was poised to drive out the invaders from Kashmir, Article 370 has played no less a part in preventing J&K from becoming an integral part of the Indian Union
Interpretation is the art or process of discovering and expounding the intended signification of
the language used in a statute, will, contract, or any other written document, that is, the meaning
which the author designed it to convey to others.
A statute is a will of legislature conveyed in the form of text. The original authority to make the
laws lies within the hands of the legislature. Therefore, the legislature is the highest competent
authority to make the laws. The laws are the strict rules and the guidelines made by the highest
authority for anyone and everyone with the subordinate authority. Laws will be followed and
obeyed to the best of its capacity if they are understood and interpreted in the right sense.
Interpretation or construction of a statute is an age-old process and as old as language. It is well
settled principle of law that as the statute is an edict of the Legislature, the conventional way of
interpreting or construing a statute is to seek the intention of legislature. The intention of
legislature assimilates two aspects; one aspect carries the concept of, meaning, i.e., what the
word means and another aspect conveys the concept of purpose and, objector the, reason or,
spirit pervading through the statute. The process of construction, therefore, combines both the
literal and purposive approaches. However, necessity of interpretation would arise only where
the language of a statutory provision is ambiguous, not clear or where two views are possible or
where the provision gives a different meaning defeating the object of the statute.
According to Blackstone the fairest and rational method for interpreting a statute is by exploring
the intention of the Legislature through the most natural and probable signs which are ‘either the
words, the context, the subject-matter, the effects and consequence, or the spirit and reason of the
law’.
Cooley states that ‘Interpretation’ is an art of finding out the true sense of any form of words,
i.e., the sense which their author intended to convey and of enabling others to derive from them
the same idea which the author intended to convey.
The United Provinces (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947, was passed as a
temporary Act, with a view mainly to continuing in force provisions relating to control or letting and
rent of accommodation similar to those contained in orders which had been issued under the
Defence of India Rules, 1939. It was expected that the situation of shortage of accommodation would
be tided over after a short period, and accordingly an Ordinance was promulgated in 1946, and it
was replaced by a temporary Act in 1947. In view, however, of the continuing increase in the urban
population and the relatively slow pace of house-building activity, mainly, due to shortage of
materials the problem of shortage of accommodation has become chronic, and the life of the Act has
had to be extended from time to time. Various amendments were also made in its provisions as and
when problems arose. Some of the provisions attracted criticism on various grounds in Courts of law
and also criticism by informed public opinion. Government gave an assurance to the Legislature that
they would soon replace the Act by a new comprehensive legislation, and accordingly, this Bill has
been prepared.
