THE LEGACY OF JUSTICE V.R. KRISHNA IYER IN THE INDIAN JUDICIARY

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE BAR IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI’S VIEWS
The role of the bar in the advancement of Indian constitutional law and jurisprudence was underlined by Justice Krishna Murari. He thinks that the constitution must develop within the country and that its application must change along with societal and political trends.

The bar’s members have had a significant part in this over the years. Some of the points that can be raised under this sub-head are as follows:

1. The bar has played a crucial role in shaping constitutional law and jurisprudence in India. Lawyers have been instrumental in interpreting and applying constitutional provisions to real-life situations.
2. The bar has been involved in landmark cases that have shaped Indian jurisprudence. For example, public interest litigation (PIL) was introduced by lawyers in India and has been used to bring about social change and protect fundamental rights.
3. Lawyers have also been involved in drafting and amending the Indian Constitution. Many of the framers of the Constitution were lawyers, and their legal expertise was crucial in shaping its provisions.
4. The bar has been instrumental in protecting fundamental rights and constitutional values. Lawyers have played a key role in challenging unconstitutional laws and practices, and ensuring that the government is held accountable.

Overall, it is impossible to overestimate the contribution made by the bar to the evolution of Indian constitutional law and jurisprudence. It demonstrates the dedication of the legal community to defending the rule of law and safeguarding fundamental rights.

THE JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY OF JUSTICE KRISHNA IYER: A PEOPLE’S JUDGE
Justice In India, Krishna Iyer is frequently referred to be the conscience keeper of justice due to his complex nature and exceptional judicial abilities. Justice for the people served as the cornerstone of his judicial philosophy. The following are some crucial aspects of his judicial philosophy:

1. Justice Iyer believed in a people-centric approach to justice. He stood up for the poor and underprivileged and worked towards making justice more humane.
2. He pioneered legal aid for the poor and jail reforms that included inmates’ rights. He got several labor and land reform laws passed and set up courts and rescue homes for women and children.
3. Justice Iyer’s vast knowledge and command over language are reflected in his judgments. His style of writing judgments was inimitable.
4. He was a prolific writer, authoring various books, and articles, and delivering many prestigious lectures. His contributions to the evolution of the Indian judicial system and legal jurisprudence are noteworthy.
5. Justice Iyer’s contribution to the development of Indian jurisprudence makes him one of the greatest judges of all time.
6. He believed that judges should be independent and impartial, and should not be influenced by political or other extraneous considerations.

Justice Krishna Iyer was a complex individual with exceptional judicial talents; he is frequently referred to as the conscience of justice in India. Justice for the people was at the heart of his jurisprudential worldview. His judicial perspective can be summed up as follows:

ADDRESSING JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN THE INDIAN SUPREME COURT: TOWARDS AN EVOLVED DEBATE
In India, judicial activism is a contentious subject, and there have been discussions over how it affects the country’s legal system. In order to confront judicial activism in the Indian Supreme Court, it is important to remember the following:

1. The Indian Supreme Court has come to occupy an important position in recent years, and its judges are considered to play an unprecedented governing role.
2. The discourse on India’s inventive and activist judiciary has evolved considerably, but the discourse in this area has not effectively engaged with the phenomenon of judicial activism in the Indian Supreme Court.
3. There have been complaints about judicial activism in most countries where courts exercise significant judicial review, particularly within common-law systems.
4. Some scholars argue that judicial activism is necessary to protect fundamental rights and ensure that the government is held accountable.
5. Others argue that judicial activism undermines the separation of powers and encroaches on the domain of the legislature and executive.
6. Justice Krishna Murari believes that the Constitution must grow with the nation, and its interpretation must adapt to changing times and policies. He emphasized the role played by members of the bar in protecting fundamental rights and constitutional values.

Overall, tackling judicial activism in the Indian Supreme Court necessitates an advanced discussion that weighs both its advantages and disadvantages. Despite the fact that judicial activism may be required to uphold fundamental rights, it can also compromise the separation of powers. It is impossible to emphasize the importance of bar members in defending constitutional principles and basic rights.

SECURING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY: THE INDIAN EXPERIENCE
Maintaining the judiciary’s independence is essential for a free society and a constitutional democracy. Here are some crucial considerations for safeguarding the judiciary’s independence in the context of India:

1. The Indian Constitution provides for a judiciary that is independent.
2. An independent judiciary ensures the rule of law, the realization of human rights, and the prosperity and stability of a society.
3. The independence of individual judges is essential to ensure the independence of the judiciary.
4. The most important aspect of the independence of the judiciary is its constitutional position.
5. The Constitution should provide for the composition and powers of the judiciary, just as it provides for the composition and powers of the executive and legislature.
6. The Indian Supreme Court has come to occupy an important position in recent years, and its judges are considered to play an unprecedented governing role.
7. The discourse on India’s inventive and activist judiciary has evolved considerably, but the discourse in this area has not effectively engaged with the phenomenon of judicial activism in the Indian Supreme Court.
8. The rise of judicial governance in the Supreme Court of India has been a topic of discussion among scholars.

In general, protecting the judiciary’s independence is essential to ensure that both individual judges and the judiciary as a whole are unbiased and free from any outside influence. Discussions about judicial activism and its effects on the independence of the judiciary have taken place in India. But it’s crucial to keep having a mature conversation about it, one that weighs both its advantages and disadvantages.

Please follow and like us: