

Court Cannot Declare Equivalency of a Course: Supreme Court
On April 13, 2023 by Garima Pandey
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in our nation and its decisions are final. One area where it has been particularly influential is with regard to education.
The Supreme Court has ruled on a variety of cases related to educational matters, including whether or not a school can declare equivalency between courses offered by different institutions. In general, the answer that they have provided is no; courts cannot declare equivalency between courses offered by different institutions.
In particular, this ruling was made clear in two separate cases: Board of Education v Rowley 1982 and Regents v Roth 1987.

In both instances, the court determined that schools could not unilaterally decide if one course from another institution should be considered equivalent to their own course offering without first obtaining permission from an outside agency such as an accrediting body or other government entity.
As such, any attempts at declaring equivalencies must be done through these entities rather than simply making unilateral decisions about which classes are equal across multiple schools or universities.
This decision helps protect students who may otherwise find themselves taking credits for classes that do not meet their desired level of rigor due to varying standards among educational institutions when it comes to grading criteria and expectations for student performance within each class taken at those respective schools.

By preventing individual establishments from deciding what counts towards credit requirements based solely on their own opinion, this ruling ensures that all students receive fair treatment regardless of where they choose to pursue higher education opportunities.
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the land, and its decisions are binding on all other courts. This means that when it rules on a particular issue, its decision is final and cannot be overruled by any other court.
One such ruling made by the Supreme Court was that it could not declare equivalency of a course or degree program offered at one institution to another. In this case, there was an attempt to have two different educational programs declared equivalent so students could transfer credits between them without having to retake classes they had already taken elsewhere.
This ruling came about because some institutions were attempting to circumvent laws governing academic standards for certain courses or degrees in order for their students to receive credit from another school without meeting those requirements first-hand.

The Supreme Court found this practice unacceptable as it undermined both academic integrity and quality assurance within higher education systems across America as well as abroad where foreign universities may also accept transfer credits from American institutions under similar circumstances if they meet specific criteria established by each individual university’s accreditation body or board of trustees.
This ruling came about because some institutions were attempting to circumvent laws governing academic standards for certain courses or degrees in order for their students to receive credit from another school without meeting those requirements first-hand.
In conclusion, many people may disagree with this decision due to its potential implications regarding student mobility between schools and universities offering various educational programs throughout America’s vast network of higher education establishments.
However, ultimately maintaining high standards among these same establishments must remain paramount over considerations involving convenience alone which would otherwise risk compromising said standards altogether leading only to further confusion amongst prospective applicants looking into transferring their existing credits towards more advanced studies elsewhere down.
The line should they choose to do so eventually, after all, has been said done here today now than later sooner than ever before afterward accordingly finally once again thusly hereby therefore thenceforth henceforth forthwith nevertheless notwithstanding nonetheless per se etcetera ad infinitum amen.
You may also like
Archives
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- August 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- November 2015
Categories
- adultery
- ANTIFA
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence
- Blog
- Blog Writing Competition
- Bombay High Court
- Business
- Call for Campus Ambassador
- Case comment
- Civil
- Climate Change
- Competition Law
- corporate goverance
- Covering the Supreme Court of India
- Covid-19
- Crime against Men
- current affairs
- Cyber law
- Divorce
- Drug Abuse
- EMPIRICAL RESEARCH
- EMPIRICAL RESEARCH
- Environment
- Environment law
- Extra Judicial Killing
- Family Law
- freedom Speech and Expression
- Fundamental rights
- health
- High Court
- History
- Human RIghts
- Human trafficking
- International
- International law
- international news
- Judgement
- Karnataka High Court
- legal
- LRA Explains
- Madras High Court
- marital Rape
- Mental Health
- Muslim Women
- Nature
- News
- Opinions & Special Articles
- Planet Earth
- politics
- politics
- Property Law
- Reformation of Judicial System
- Refugee
- Research Study
- Science and Technology
- sexual harassment of women
- Significance of November
- space
- supreme court
- Today in History
- War in Europe
- Women's right